Metastatic lymph node characteristics predicting prognosis of papillary thyroid cancer patients
Editorial

Metastatic lymph node characteristics predicting prognosis of papillary thyroid cancer patients

Min-Ji Jeon, Young-Kee Shong

Division of Endocrinology & Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence to: Young-Kee Shong. Division of Endocrinology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Korea. Email: ykshong@amc.seoul.kr.

Comment on: Gao W, Zhao T, Liang J, et al. Is the ratio superior to the number of metastatic lymph nodes in addressing the response in patients with papillary thyroid cancer? Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97:e9664.


Received: 16 May 2018; Accepted: 11 June 2018; Published: 25 June 2018.

doi: 10.21037/aot.2018.06.01


Metastases to cervical lymph nodes (LNs) in patients with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) are common and associated with up to 80% of PTC patients (1). Cervical LN metastasis itself has been known as a risk factor for recurrent/persistent disease and PTC with lateral cervical LN metastasis has a worse prognosis than that with central neck LN metastasis (2,3). Recent studies suggested that other various metastatic LN characteristics, such as the number, size, and the presence of extranodal extension of metastatic LNs, are also prognostic (4,5).

While PTC patients with cervical LN metastases were classified as having intermediate risk in the previous 2009 American Thyroid Association (ATA) risk stratification system, the risk of structural recurrent/persistent disease varies according to the number or size of metastatic LNs. For example, patients with ≤5 metastatic LNs or all involved LNs <0.2 cm has only 4–5% of risk but, patients with >5 metastatic LN or clinically evident macroscopic metastatic LNs has about 20% of risk of structural recurrent/persistent disease in PTC (1). As a result, recent revised ATA risk stratification system classified PTC patients with ≤5 N1 micrometastases (<0.2 cm in largest dimension) as ATA low risk, whereas pathologic N1 with ≥3 cm in largest dimension or extranodal extension as ATA high risk (2).

Metastatic LN ratio, defined as the number of metastatic LNs divided by the number of dissected LNs, represent the extent of LN involvement and completeness of LN dissection and also seems to be predictive of structural recurrent/persistent disease of PTC (6). Because the number of metastatic LNs and the metastatic LN ratio are closely related, it is uncertain which of them has a more value for predicting prognosis of PTC patients.

One recent study by Gao et al. (7) is nicely compared the prognostic value of metastatic LN ratio with the number of metastatic LNs. Interestingly, the metastatic LN ratio was more predictive of excellent response to initial therapy in patients with ≤10 dissected LNs, while the number of metastatic LNs was more predictive in patients with >10 dissected LNs. Their result suggests that metastatic LN ratio might be a more appropriate prognostic factor in case of inadequate LN dissection. However, appropriate cutoff point of metastatic LN ratio is not well established in this study and further confirmation studies are needed. In case of complete LN dissection, the number of metastatic LNs presents the actual extent of LN metastasis and might be more informative.

Recent evidences suggested that various metastatic LNs characteristics are predictive of recurrent/persistent disease in PTC and should be carefully evaluated and described in the pathology report. However, the impact of these various metastatic LNs characteristics on survival of PTC patients is less well developed. Recently revised 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer Tumor Node Metastasis staging system only classified N1 disease from N0 disease. N1 disease is classified as stage I in patients <55 years old at diagnosis and reclassified as stage II in older patients. Small-volume LN metastasis might have little impact on the risk of disease-specific survival but, no studies have adequately evaluated the impact of size, number or ratio of metastatic LNs on survival (8).


Acknowledgments

Funding: None.


Footnote

Provenance and Peer Review: This article was commissioned and reviewed by Section Editor Dr. Yijun Wu (Thyroid Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China).

Conflicts of Interest: Both authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/aot.2018.06.01). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Randolph GW, Duh QY, Heller KS, et al. The prognostic significance of nodal metastases from papillary thyroid carcinoma can be stratified based on the size and number of metastatic lymph nodes, as well as the presence of extranodal extension. Thyroid 2012;22:1144-52. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid 2016;26:1-133. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Jeon MJ, Kim WG, Kim TH, et al. Disease-Specific Mortality of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Patients in Korea: A Multicenter Cohort Study. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 2017;32:434-41. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Wang LY, Palmer FL, Nixon IJ, et al. Central lymph node characteristics predictive of outcome in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 2014;24:1790-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Wang LY, Palmer FL, Nixon IJ, et al. Lateral Neck Lymph Node Characteristics Prognostic of Outcome in Patients with Clinically Evident N1b Papillary Thyroid Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2015;22:3530-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Jeon MJ, Yoon JH, Han JM, et al. The prognostic value of the metastatic lymph node ratio and maximal metastatic tumor size in pathological N1a papillary thyroid carcinoma. Eur J Endocrinol 2013;168:219-25. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Gao W, Zhao T, Liang J, et al. Is the ratio superior to the number of metastatic lymph nodes in addressing the response in patients with papillary thyroid cancer? Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97:e9664. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Amin MB, Edge S, Greene F, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed. New York: Springer, 2017.
doi: 10.21037/aot.2018.06.01
Cite this article as: Jeon MJ, Shong YK. Metastatic lymph node characteristics predicting prognosis of papillary thyroid cancer patients. Ann Thyroid 2018;3:15.

Download Citation